Syria has opened the door
to a serious discussion of Muslim immigration. Whether the United States
should accept any of the Muslims who have escaped Syria.
Those opposed are fearful
of terrorists being able to easily sneak into the U.S. disguised as
immigrants. A valid concern. However, not the real problem.
Republicans and some
Democrats are using the terrorist argument to adopt more stringent vetting laws.
Such persons fail to realize that the vetting process already in place works
well.
A vetting process that
takes 1.5 to 2 years. As regards the thousands of immigrants
granted entry in recent years, only three turned out to be terrorists.
Typical of political
leaders the past quarter century, the blind cannot see. They have failed and
continue to fail to see what would occur if a large number of Muslim immigrants
were permitted entry.
I do not believe that
Congress pays close attention to what is going on in the world.
Congress fails to understand or take the time to understand the niitty gritty
of most issues.
Xenophobia is the intense
or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries. Islam phobia is
the dislike/fear of Muslims.
I am guilty of both
phobias. Except, my xenophobia is not irrational.
The ultimate goal of
Islam is world domination. A step at a time. Immigrate to countries. Join each
other in living in specific neighborhoods. Keep local authority out. Rule yourselves.
Apply Sharia law. The ultimate goal over a long period of time being to take
control of host countries. One by one.
Conversion a part of the
program. Convert Christians to Islam. If they refuse, kill them.
The same as ISIS is doing to Christians in the Middle East. Jews kill
outright. They should not be provided the conversion option.
Muslims who settle in
another country want their Muslim culture and customs adopted. They do not want
to assimilate. The Koran prohibits it. Conversion the key and not assimilation.
Keep in mind the goal is
world domination.
Muslim immigrants want to
live as they have in their previous homeland as regards the Koran. Things like
child marriage, lashings, stonings, honor killings of women,
anti-Semitism, special rights for Muslim workers, demand that Sharia law
be substituted for existing civil law, and more.
Muslim experiences in
European countries provide clear definitive proof.
Britain already has in
excess of 85 Sharia courts. Britain gave in to Muslim demands in this regard.
Britain also has no-go zones across the country. Areas too dangerous for
non Muslims to enter. These no go zones are microstates in effect
ruled under Sharia law, the Muslims having rejected Britain's legal system.
There is a campaign to
turn 12 British cities into independent Islamic states. The cities include
Birmingham, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester and Londonistan.
There are Tower Hamlets
in East London. They are referred to by Muslims as Tower Hamlets Taliban. The
Muslims control the Hamlets. They issue death threats to unveiled women and
attack gays. Leaflets are distributed: "You are in a Sharia controlled
zone". Islamic rules enforced."
John Reid, Britain's Home
Secretary, visited East London. He was challenged by a leading Islamist:
"How dare you come to a Muslim area?"
Britain made a
grave error when Muslims started showing up in numbers. They acceded to what
was demanded. They protected what they viewed as the rights of Islamists.
Britain tried to be the good guy, the fair one. To Britain's
detriment. Now it is thought to be too late to do anything about the problem.
France is in the news big
time these days. No wonder. France has the largest Muslim population in Europe.
Six and a half million. The French Muslim population has reached the point
where it wants a parallel Muslim society with the French. A parallel
society ruled by Sharia law.
The Muslims have created
neighborhoods/zones that they control. To the exclusion of those of other
faiths and the French government. They are called Sensitive Urban Zones (ZUS).
There are 751 such zones in France.
Disturbances a
nightly thing. Burning of cars, blocked streets and sidewalks for Friday prayers,
mosques broadcasting sermons and chants via street loudspeakers, etc.
The activities are
downplayed in the French media. The reason being the press does not want to be
accused of racism or Islamophobia. Local authorities do nothing. They do
not want to confront what is in actuality an occupation of their cities. Tanks
and soldiers would be required.
The Dutch government
reports 40 no-go zones exist in the Netherlands. Twenty percent of the
population is Muslim.
Police send two patrol
cars on calls. Each to protect the other. Hostile Muslims throw rocks at the
police cars. The police do nothing. They are so ordered.
During the Islamic month
of Ramadan, the police were ordered by their superiors not to drink coffee or
eat in public places for fear of offending the Muslims.
Sweden is considered by
the Muslims as ".....the best Islamic state."
The City of Malmo has
a 25 percent Muslim population. Whole patches of the city are no-go zones. In Malmo and Gothenberg,
Muslim teenagers burn cars, attack emergency services, throw stones at
patrolling officers, and temporarily blind police officers with green lasers.
Germany is no different.
The same problems as Britain, France, the Netherlands and Sweden. Such being
the case, I can not understand why Merkel wants to accept a
million more Muslim refugees.
Germany is confronted
with zone type neighborhoods. Intimidation and violence common place. Muslims
push all infidels whose secular values are different form theirs out. The
Muslims in many instances refuse public services such as police, firefighters
and ambulances. Stones, bottles and bullets meet any public service entity
seeking admission.
The result is the German
zones are war zones. The government has retreated. Germany's Chief Police
Commissioner Bernhard Witthaut said, "The power of the state is completely
out of the picture."
Italy is not yet as bad
as the previous countries mentioned. The process is underway,
however.
The Muslims have
commandeered Rome's Piazza Venegia for public prayers. In Bologna, Islamists repeatedly
threaten to bomb San Petronio Cathedral. The Cathedral contains a fresco
which depicts the prophet Mohamed being tormented in hell.
The proof of the pudding
is what has been represented. Muslim immigrants want to create parallel
societies. They want to remain segregated from other people in the host nation.
Integration is not an option for them.
Islamic scholar Robert
Spencer said it best. He believes what Islamic supremacists want is not merely
a place at the table--equal rights under the law as previous minority groups have
sought in civil rights movements....they want their own table, utterly distinct
from the man made laws of infidels.
We are the
infidels.
The U.S. is beset with
enough of its own internal problems. There is no need to foist another on top
of it all by accepting Muslim immigrants. They do not want our way of
life.
Previous immigrants came
and learned to be Americans. They wanted to be Americans. The Italians, Irish,
Poles, Germans, and more recently the Bosnians.
My position a simple one.
If you do not like us or want to be like us, do not come here. Stay where ever
you are or somewhere else in the world. We betray ourselves and our heritage if
we take any number of them in.
I can see the uproar my
words will cause with some. Anti-religious the cry. Lacking in charity. Un-American.
I do not buy it. Primary importance is to preserve our way of life for
ourselves, our children and grandchildren.
Two closing observations.
The Middle East countries
of affluence such as Saudi Arabia have refused to take any of the Syrian
immigrants in. The immigrants are their people. Such says something.
The American media has
failed to inform us of much which is contained herein. Why? Another example of
the press' failure to keep us advised. It is referred to as selective news
reporting.